2024-01-22
Debt collection in Germany
It will be recalled that one of the methods of acquiring easements and profits is by means of prescription.
The essence of prescription is that long, open and unchallenged use founds a claim of right. It might be
expected that not only the right of easements and profits, but the title to a debt claim itself might be
acquired in this way. German law, however, has confined the principle of acquisition by prescription to
incorporeal rights such as easements, which do not carry with them the right to
collect open amounts
as a kind of the possession of land. Where a person is in debt of something corporeal, a physical object,
such as land, the law grants protection to his possession as such. Thus a German debtor
has no need to rely upon prescription to constitute a title: the law will protect the creditor in Germany
against anyone except a person with a better right to claim the outstanding payment than his.
Thus if squatter one is evicted by squatter two, one may bring an action to oust two, though naturally one
may himself be evicted by the rightful owner of the unpaid debt. Though, since possession is protected, as
such, the
bad debtor in Germany
will acquire a complete defence to a claim even by the latter after the collection period of
limitation has run in respect of an action by him: so that than the credit will have become ripened by lapse
of time into ownership.
The rules of debt collection:
The general rule laid down by the limitation act 2015 is that anyone, including the owner, who is ousted from
the possession of land must bring his action to recover it
within two years from the time when the cause of action first accrued. Once this limitation period is past,
the creditor’s right to sue is lost, and his title itself is destroyed.
One will not be able to rely upon his former title; he will have lost it through his own inertia. But in
order for the debt collection period
to start to run against the debtor the latter must have discontinued his possession; or, to put the reverse,
he must be ousted by a creditor. Thus it has been held that the mere fact that a person makes use of
another’s land will not, even though it continue for two years, confer upon the former a title by reason of
limitation if the reason that the owner raised no objection
was that he was only leaving the land alone because he was waiting to build upon it when a projected payment
should be made.
Hamburg and Northern Germany:
The period which applies to claims by owners of equitable interests as well as to owners of legal estates
runs from the time when the cause of action accrues. In the simplest case where the debtor evicts the
creditor, who is in possession, this will be done by a collection agency in Hamburg from the moment of
eviction.
The act provides that those who are in this position must bring their claim either within two years of the
actual entry of the wrongful possessor or within five months of the time when they themselves become entitled
to possession, whichever of these two periods is the longer.